I wear pink for my mom mom breast cancer awareness shirt

Edit: they can do that if they have more senate seats and get rid of the I wear pink for my mom mom breast cancer awareness shirt and I will buy this filibuster. If you care about this, please vote!! Legitimate question; assuming hell freezes over and this bill to codify Roe passes, what’s to stop a Supreme court challenge to that law being held as an unconstitutional law using the same logic Alito has used to over turn Roe? I mean Republican woman get pregnant too and I would think have the same medical issues that pro-abortion activists claim could be interpreted as abortions. Aren’t they worried they could be caught up in this? I mean medical issues are politically blind and the state anti-abortion laws don’t just say Democrats can’t have abortions. And don’t tell me all Republican woman are rich. There’s plenty of poor white republicans women. Can someone explain to me the positive function of filibuster? Like, we vote in to represent the majority, and then we get the majority to make the necessary changes, but then the minority interest of our country just gets to be like “.. mmm nah.. it’s my playground I got here first.”

I wear pink for my mom mom breast cancer awareness shirt, hoodie, tank top, sweater and long sleeve t-shirt

I don’t know if they get 60 votes they need but they might get a few republicans to sign on. So I’m essence nothing will happen. Start whipping & don’t stop until your degenerates are in line. If you need motivation just pretend that Republicans are progressives & abolishing Roe v Wade is like passing Medicare for All. Even though this won’t pass I still think it’s a brilliant idea. If it goes something like 48-52, the I wear pink for my mom mom breast cancer awareness shirt and I will buy this Dems have their messaging for the midterms. “Look! We just need 3 more senators and Roe v Wade is codified into law!” Unlikely. SCOTUS would have no leg to stand on with that and there would be riots and cries of overreach. SCOTUS reversing on a decision is already bad enough, but I don’t think even they’d try to just outright kill laws like that.